NSA phone surveillance not authorized: U.S. appeals court.
(Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Thursday revived a challenge to a controversial National Security Agency program that collected the records of millions of Americans phone calls, saying the program was not authorized��.
Privacy perverted: No telco ever disobeyed NSA phone.
No telecommunications company ever refused to follow the secret US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts orders to turn over bulk phone records under the Patriot Act, despite a legal mechanism to���. In 2006, before bulk phone records collection was moved under the authority of the FISA court, the only big telecommunications company who refused to help the NSA was Qwest, sources told the newspaper. On 29 August, Eagan not only approved the US��.
Privacy group demands Supreme Court halts NSA. - RT.com
A privacy watchdog group on Thursday announced that it will file a petition asking the Supreme Court to vacate the ruling that allows the National Security Agency to gather domestic surveillance data.. At a Restore the Fourth rally in Washington, D.C. on Thursday, the Domestic Surveillance Project division of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) announced plans to once again urge the high court to revoke authorization of the NSA spy programs. The rally��.
NSAs telephone metadata collection not authorized by.
NSAs telephone metadata collection not authorized by Patriot Act - appeals court. Published time: May 07, 2015 14:29. Get short URL. AFP Photo/Paul J. Richards. The collection of telephone metadata by US intelligence services ���exceeds. There is no evidence of such a debate in the legislative history of �� 215, and the language of the statute, on its face, is not naturally read as permitting investigative agencies, on the approval of the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court], to do��.
NSA phone surveillance not authorized: U.S. appeals court.
Posted at 9:47 on May 7, 2015 by. NEW YORK (Reuters) ��� A federal appeals court on Thursday said a National Security Agency program that collected the records of millions of Americans phone calls was not authorized by Congress.
Do surveillance courts secret rulings violate U.S.. - Reuters
Based on recent comments by U.S. Supreme Court Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer, the court is primed for an inevitable constitutional review of the National Security Agencys program of gathering phone and Internet data from. John McConnell (the former NSA chief), ACLU staff lawyers and outside counsel from Proskauer Rose argued that the 2008 law is unconstitutional not only because it violates the Fourth Amendment strictures on unreasonable��.
Obama lauds new Iraq leaders, despite al-Maliki protest
(Photo: Nicholas Kamm, AFP/Getty Images). Echoing previous comments, Obama said there is no American military solution to the larger crisis in Iraq, and the Iraqis must solve their own problems -- starting with formation of a government that.
Washington - U.S. Appeals Court: NSA Phone Surveillance.
Writing for a three-judge appeals court panel, however, Circuit Judge Gerard Lynch said Congress did not authorize the NSA program under a section of the Patriot Act governing how investigators may collect information to fight terrorism.. REUTERS. Washington - A federal appeals court on Thursday revived a challenge to a controversial National Security Agency program that collected the records of millions of Americans phone calls, saying the program was not��.
NSA phone surveillance not authorized-US appeals court
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Thursday revived a challenge to a controversial National Security Agency program that collected the records of millions of Americans phone calls, saying the program was not authorized by Congress. The.