US top court stops enforcement of landmark law on voting discrimination; Obama ...

Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act : Videos

Moment Woman Republican Started Cheering ... Moment Woman Republican Started Cheering ... Ms Schmidt was standing outside the Supreme Court as the ... President Obama himself ... Duration: 19 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Sat, 30 Jun 2012 00:46:48 -0700

Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act : Photo Gallery

SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - The ... SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - The ... Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act - The	SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - The ... SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - The ... Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act - The	SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - The ... SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - The ... Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act - The	SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - One ... SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - One ... Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act - One
Comedian Sandra Bernhard stops by FOX 10 Comedian Sandra Bernhard stops by FOX 10 Comedian Sandra Bernhard stops by FOX 10	i47.jpg i47.jpg i47.jpg	Supreme Court halts use of key part of Voting Rights Act | The ... Supreme Court halts use of key part of Voting Rights Act | The ... Supreme Court halts use of key part of Voting Rights Act | The	i53.jpg i53.jpg i53.jpg
SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act	SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - One ... SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - One ... Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act - One	U.S. Supreme Court stops enforcement of landmark law on voting ... U.S. Supreme Court stops enforcement of landmark law on voting ... U.S. Supreme Court stops enforcement of landmark law on voting	wapo.png wapo.png wapo.png
hottest stories from [washingtonpost.com - nation, world ... hottest stories from [washingtonpost.com - nation, world ... hottest stories from [washingtonpost.com - nation, world	Obama 'disappointed' in Voting Rights Act ruling - One News Page [ Obama 'disappointed' in Voting Rights Act ruling - One News Page [ Obama 'disappointed' in Voting Rights Act ruling - One News Page [	Supreme Court voids key part of Voting Rights Act | WIAT CBS42 Supreme Court voids key part of Voting Rights Act | WIAT CBS42 Supreme Court voids key part of Voting Rights Act | WIAT CBS42	Supreme Court Says Voting Rights Act Is Unconstitutional ... Supreme Court Says Voting Rights Act Is Unconstitutional ... Supreme Court Says Voting Rights Act Is Unconstitutional
THE EXTREMIST TYRANT AND HIS LACKEY THE EXTREMIST TYRANT AND HIS LACKEY THE EXTREMIST TYRANT AND HIS LACKEY	VOTER FRAUD BY THE LEFT.....HOW THE NEW ACORN PLANS TO STEAL THE ELECTION...............ACORNS NEW BRANDS.....THEY WILL USE SOME OF THESE TO TRY TO STEAL THE ELECTION IN 2012 VOTER FRAUD BY THE LEFT.....HOW THE NEW ACORN PLANS TO STEAL THE ELECTION...............ACORNS NEW BRANDS.....THEY WILL USE SOME OF THESE TO TRY TO STEAL THE ELECTION IN 2012 VOTER FRAUD BY THE LEFT.....HOW THE NEW ACORN PLANS TO STEAL THE ELECTION...............ACORNS NEW BRANDS.....THEY WILL USE SOME OF THESE TO TRY TO STEAL THE ELECTION IN 2012	The Making of Indian Foreign Policy : The Role of Scholarship and Public Opinion By Mr. C. Raja Mohan The Making of Indian Foreign Policy : The Role of Scholarship and Public Opinion By Mr. C. Raja Mohan The Making of Indian Foreign Policy : The Role of Scholarship and Public Opinion By Mr. C. Raja Mohan	the godfather the godfather the godfather
ACT UP 20th Anniversary ACT UP 20th Anniversary ACT UP 20th Anniversary	ACT UP 20th Anniversary ACT UP 20th Anniversary ACT UP 20th Anniversary	Senator Harry Reid (D) Nevada Senator Harry Reid (D) Nevada Senator Harry Reid (D) Nevada	SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT “For nearly 50 years, the Voting Rights Act . . . has helped secure the right to vote for millions of Americans,” President Obama said in a statement. “Today's decision invalidating one of its core provisions upsets decades of well-established ...
US top court stops enforcement of landmark law on voting discrimination; Obama ... US top court stops enforcement of landmark law on voting discrimination; Obama ... The Supreme Court said Tuesday that a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act cannot be enforced until Congress comes up with a new way of determining which states and localities require close federal monitoring of elections. ... the ...	Twelve different IRS units nationwide targeted conservatives Twelve different IRS units nationwide targeted conservatives “I was essentially a front person, because I had no autonomy or no authority to act on [applications] without Carter Hull's influence or input,” Hofacre said. “We know that the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division in Washington, D.C. was ...	KEYC - Mankato News, Weather, Sports - - Light turnout predicted as Mass ... KEYC - Mankato News, Weather, Sports - - Light turnout predicted as Mass ... ... key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act cannot be enforced until Congress comes up with a new way of determining which states and localities require close federal monitoring of... A deeply divided Supreme Court threw out the most powerful ...	UCLA one win away from first CWS championship UCLA one win away from first CWS championship Senate passage of historic immigration legislation offering citizenship to millions looks near-certain after the bill cleared a key hurdle with votes to spare. Senate passage of historic ... A deeply divided Supreme Court threw out the most powerful ...
UCLA beats Miss. St. 3-1 in opener of CWS finals - KNOE 8 News; KNOE-TV ... UCLA beats Miss. St. 3-1 in opener of CWS finals - KNOE 8 News; KNOE-TV ... The Supreme Court says a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act cannot be enforced until Congress comes up with a new way of determining which states and localities require close federal monitoring of... A deeply divided Supreme Court on ...	Rick Santorum named head of movie studio Rick Santorum named head of movie studio And the keys are great content and economic success using money from all over to build out the industry and distribute an authentic product truthful to the faith in people's lives,” Santorum said. EchoLight is set to release a film in 2014 about ...	Dems Approach Abortion Victory as Special Session Wanes Dems Approach Abortion Victory as Special Session Wanes Using delaying tactics and parliamentary rules, the minority party argued into the wee hours in the state House on Monday morning and then stuck together to keep the GOP from jamming Senate Bill 5 through the Senate in the afternoon and evening ...	GOP staffer declares victory over food stamp challenge: 'Nothing tastes better ... GOP staffer declares victory over food stamp challenge: 'Nothing tastes better ... The bill ultimately failed last week in large part due to disagreements over the cuts to SNAP. “The SNAP Challenge is a great tool to show how much savings we can find in the budget,” said Ferguson. “The only thing Democrats proved is they can't budget ...
One More Metaphor for the Gang of 8 One More Metaphor for the Gang of 8 Preliminary Search for Loopholes in a Cloud: I've been trying to think of the right metaphor for the giant Corker-Hoeven amendment, the one that is reportedly giving the Gang of 8′s immigration bill enough votes to pass the Senate. .... “implemented ...	Supreme Court strikes down Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship to vote Supreme Court strikes down Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship to vote The vote was 7-2. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, said that a 1993 federal law known as the Motor Voter Act takes precedence over the Arizona law because of its requirement that states “accept and use” the federal voter registration ...	Voting Rights Act decision expected to be an emotional moment Voting Rights Act decision expected to be an emotional moment A potential Supreme Court change in the Voting Rights Act of 1965 could be one of the most emotional moments in what will be a high-profile month for the nation's highest court. ... Holder and is considering striking down a critical part of the ...	Going Galt: Why men are boycotting marriage, fatherhood and the American ... Going Galt: Why men are boycotting marriage, fatherhood and the American ... “It used to be that being a grown-up, responsible man was rewarded with respect, power and deference.” Now, not so much. Making matters worse, men cannot voice frustration. “Men who complain are either wimps or misogynists or both,” she writes. During ...
New poll shows little voter support for immigration deal New poll shows little voter support for immigration deal “It is the right thing to do… [and] it is ultimately in the interests of the Republican Party,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said Friday. The NumbersUSA poll paints a very different picture from other polls, many of which have been promoted by the ...	Bring voting into the digital age Bring voting into the digital age (CNN) -- Now that the Supreme Court has invalidated part of Arizona's voter registration law, states should be thinking twice before introducing laws to make it harder to cast a ballot. Monday's decision is indeed a big victory for voters — but it is ...	Paula Deen is sorry for using racial slurs [VIDEO] Paula Deen is sorry for using racial slurs [VIDEO] Celebrity chef and trans-fat enthusiast Paula Deen apologized to her family, business partners and friends in a video statement posted to YouTube on Friday after she admitted to using racial slurs in the past. Earlier this week, a transcript of a ...

Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act : Latest News, Information, Answers and Websites

SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT

10 hours ago ... The Supreme Court on Tuesday freed states from special federal oversight under the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965, saying the data ...

SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - Topic ...

25 June 2013. Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act. The Supreme Court today ruled 5-4 that Section 4 of the Voting Rights ...

Tough Times For Democratic Rights In The Imperial Homeland

Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act. Video: Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday he was “very disappointed” with the supreme court's invalidation of part of the Voting Rights Act. 3725.

THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE; Transcript of the Second Debate Between Bush and Dukakis

LEAD: PARTICIPANTS IN THE DEBATE CANDIDATES: Vice President Bush, Republican, and Michael S. Dukakis, Democrat. MODERATOR: Bernard Shaw, anchor, Cable News Network. PANELISTS: Ann Compton, correspondent, ABC News; Andrea Mitchell, White House correspondent, NBC News; Margaret Garrard Warner, White House correspondent, Newsweek. PARTICIPANTS IN THE

What can be done to stop conservative suppression of Hispanic American Voters?

Supreme Court Strikes Down Key Part of Voting Rights Act
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/26/us/supreme-court-ruling.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Category: Politics

SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT

9 hours ago ... Supreme Court stops use of key part of Voting Rights Act — The Supreme Court on Tuesday freed states from special federal oversight under ...

Examples of a Bipartisan Obama?

All presidential candidates, and government representatives for that matter, promise to work in a bipartisan manner to accomplish things. Rarely is this promise kept. Few members in government have demonstrated the ability to work in a bipartisan manner. As the 2008 election nears, Obama has also stated that this is one of his goals.

Is there any evidence whatsoever that with the time hes spent in government that he would honor this? This is a change that I could believe in.

Answer: In 2005, Obama joined Republicans in passing a law dubiously called the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) that would shut down state courts as a venue to hear many class action lawsuits. Long a desired objective of large corporations and President George Bush, Obama in effect voted to deny redress in many of the courts where these kinds of cases have the best chance of surviving corporate legal challenges. Instead, it forces them into the backlogged Republican-judge dominated federal courts.

By contrast, Senators Clinton, Edwards and Kerry joined 23 others to vote against CAFA, noting the “reform” was a thinly-veiled “special interest extravaganza” that favored banking, creditors and other corporate interests. David Sirota, the former spokesman for Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee, commented on CAFA in the June 26, 2006 issue of The Nation, “Opposed by most major civil rights and consumer watchdog groups, this Big Business-backed legislation was sold to the public as a way to stop "frivolous" lawsuits. But everyone in Washington knew the bill's real objective was to protect corporate abusers.”

These seemingly unusual votes wherein Obama aligns himself with Republican Party interests aren’t new. While in the Illinois Senate, Obama voted to limit the recovery that victims of medical malpractice could obtain through the courts. Capping non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases means a victim cannot fully recover for pain and suffering or for punitive damages. Moreover, it ignored that courts were already empowered to adjust awards when appropriate, and that the Illinois Supreme Court had previously ruled such limits on tort reform violated the state constitution.

In the US Senate, Obama continued interfering with patients’ full recovery for tortious conduct. He was a sponsor of the National Medical Error Disclosure and Compensation Act of 2005. The bill requires hospitals to disclose errors to patients and has a mechanism whereby disclosure, coupled with apologies, is rewarded by limiting patients’ economic recovery. Rather than simply mandating disclosure, Obama’s solution is to trade what should be mandated for something that should never be given away: namely, full recovery for the injured patient.

MINING LAW OF 1872:

In November 2007, Obama came out against a bill that would have reformed the notorious Mining Law of 1872. The current statute, signed into law by Ulysses Grant, allows mining companies to pay a nominal fee, as little as $2.50 an acre, to mine for hardrock minerals like gold, silver, and copper without paying royalties. Yearly profits for mining hardrock on public lands is estimated to be in excess of $1 billion a year according to Earthworks, a group that monitors the industry. Not surprisingly, the industry spends freely when it comes to lobbying: an estimated $60 million between 1998-2004 according to The Center on Public Integrity. And it appears to be paying off, yet again.

The Hardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2007 would have finally overhauled the law and allowed American taxpayers to reap part of the royalties (4 percent of gross revenue on existing mining operations and 8 percent on new ones). The bill provided a revenue source to cleanup abandoned hardrock mines, which is likely to cost taxpayers over $50 million, and addressed health and safety concerns in the 11 affected western states.

Later it came to light that one of Obama’s key advisors in Nevada is a Nevada-based lobbyist in the employ of various mining companies (CBS News “Obama’s Position On Mining Law Questioned. Democrat Shares Position with Mining Executives Who Employ Lobbyist Advising Him,” November 14, 2007).

The New York Times reported that, while campaigning in Iowa in December 2007, Obama boasted that he had passed a bill requiring nuclear plants to promptly report radioactive leaks. This came after residents of his home state of Illinois complained they were not told of leaks that occurred at a nuclear plant operated by Exelon Corporation.

The truth, however, was that Obama allowed the bill to be amended in Committee by Senate Republicans, replacing language mandating reporting with verbiage that merely offered guidance to regulators on how to address unreported leaks. The story noted that even this version of Obama’s bill failed to pass the Senate, so it was unclear why Obama was claiming to have passed the legislation. The February 3, 2008 The New York Times article titled “Nuclear Leaks and Response Tested Obama in Senate” by Mike McIntire also noted the opinion of one of Obama’s constituents, which was hardly enthusiastic about Obama’s legislative efforts:

"Senator Obama's staff was sending us copies of the bill to review, and we could see it weakening with each successive draft," said Joe Cosgrove, a park district director in Will County, Ill., where low-level radioactive runoff had turned up in groundwater. "The teeth were just taken out of it."

As it turns out, the New York Times story noted: “Since 2003, executives and employees of Exelon, which is based in Illinois, have contributed at least $227,000 to Mr. Obama’s campaigns for the United States Senate and for president. Two top Exelon officials, Frank M. Clark, executive vice president, and John W. Rogers Jr., a director, are among his largest fund-raisers.”



http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/The_Obama_Craze_Count_Me_Out_5413.html


Change we can believe in? To me not so much

The demand for bipartisan unity serves to obscure the objective reality of a society that is riven by class and social divisions. The agents of Wall Street who preach the gospel of “unity” have good reason to suppress any genuine political discussion. They preside over a country where the concentration of wealth has reached unprecedented levels, with the top 1 percent of families owning 40 percent of the nation’s net worth. And the economic disparities continue to grow.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/jan2008/elec-j11.shtml
Category: Elections

Supreme Court halts use of key provision in landmark Voting Rights ...

11 hours ago ... The Supreme Court says a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act cannot be enforced until Congress comes up with a new way of ...

Voting Rights Act decision expected to be an emotional moment

Subscribe · Tweet. A potential Supreme Court change in the Voting Rights Act of 1965 could be one of the most emotional moments in what will be a high-profile month for the nation's highest court. ... Another key part of the Voting Rights Act wasn't under consideration in February: Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or membership in a minority group. Recent Constitution Daily ...

Daily News: Reuters News Headlines - Supreme Court - live news ...

By Lawrence Hurley WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Tuesday gutted a key part of the landmark Voting Rights Act, passed in 1965 to end a century of attempts by former slaveholding states to block blacks from voting. ... By Bernard Vaughan NEW YORK (Reuters) - Former Oregon gubernatorial candidate Craig Berkman pleaded guilty on Tuesday to defrauding investors by persuading them he could use their money to buy shares of Facebook Inc ...

SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - The ...

10 hours ago ... The Supreme Court says a piece of the act cannot be enforced until Congress can determine which localities require close monitoring of ...

THE 2000 CAMPAIGN; Transcript of Debate Between Vice President Gore and Governor Bush

Following is a transcript of the presidential debate last night in Boston between Gov. George W. Bush of Texas and Vice President Al Gore, as recorded by The New York Times. The moderator was Jim Lehrer of PBS. MR. LEHRER -- Good evening from the Clark Athletic Center at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. Im Jim Lehrer of The News Hour - Transcript of presidential debate between Gov George W Bush and Vice Pres Al Gore, moderated by Jim Lehrer (L)

Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act - USA Today

9 hours ago ... The Supreme Court swept away nearly 50 years of civil rights history, declaring a key part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act unconstitutional ...

SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - The ...

10 hours ago ... A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday invalidated a crucial component of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965, ruling that Congress has not ...

Voting Rights Act 'effectively gutted' by high court, critics say | Nation ...

A deeply divided Supreme Court threw out the most powerful part of the landmark Voting Rights Act on Tuesday, a decision deplored by the White House but cheered by mostly Southern states now free from nearly 50 years of intense ... The decision effectively puts an end to the advance approval requirement that has been used to open up polling places to minority voters in the nearly half century since it was first enacted in 1965, unless Congress can come up with a ...

Diary of a Republican Hater: SCOTUS Cheif Justice John Roberts ...

"When he was in his late 20s, John Roberts was a foot soldier in the Reagan administration's crusade against the Voting Rights Act. Now, as chief justice of the Supreme Court, he will help determine whether a key part of the ...

PrawfsBlawg: The Voting Rights Act is Dead. Long Live the Voting ...

Long Live the Voting Rights Act! Well, so much for strategic compromise. The Supreme Court ruled this morning, along ideological lines in a 5-4 decision, to invalidate a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. The funny (or sad) ...

SUPREME COURT STOPS USE OF KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - One ...

9 hours ago ... The Supreme Court on Tuesday freed states from special federal oversight under the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965, saying the data ...

GayPatriot » One person, one vote

In her dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg writes the “sad irony” of Roberts' decision is that it strikes down the key part of the Voting Rights Act because it has been so successful at preventing racial discrimination. “Throwing out ... Such an issue is certainly within the purview of the Supreme Court; the validity of elections is not the equivalent the proper use of cell phones or liquor control. Comment by ... Uh, no. It's like putting away your umbrella when it stops raining.

Key part of Voting Rights Act Stricken down by Supreme Court - JD ...

Key part of Voting Rights Act Stricken down by Supreme Court. Today the Supreme Court struck down a part of the historically significant Voting Rights act. According to Supremecourt.gov, Justice Roberts commented that the ...

Today is a sad day for American Democracy, do you agree?

Voting rights were just squashed today.

WASHINGTON, June 25, 2013 -- /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Supreme Courts decision today to strike down a key part of the Voting Rights Act is an act of extraordinary judicial overreach. The Supreme Court ruling takes the most powerful tool our nation has to defend minority voting rights out of commission. By second-guessing Congress judgment about which places should be covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the Court has left millions of minority voters without the mechanism that has allowed them to stop voting discrimination before it occurs. This is like letting you keep your car, but taking away the keys. To say that I am disappointed is an understatement. Congress must step in.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/06/25/5522879/supreme-court-ruling-on-voting.html#storylink=cpy

Category: Politics

American Atheists and Homosexuals: Do you REALLY want a civil war?

Im noticing an increase in prop 8 questions. Just a few days before the state of California decides whether it will honor the laws of the land or whether it will go against the people and rape this laws of this nation.

Understand this: the state of California has NO RIGHT to overturn prop 8. That would be unconsitituional and illegal. The state has no right to overturn what the PEOPLE "we the people" voted on. I dont live in California, but unfortuatley is IS part of my country, so what happens there does affect us even at the other side of the country. If California overturns Propoisition 8 ... there will be hell to pay, because the intelligent law abiding citizens of this nation will not allow one of our states to violate the constitution of this nation by going against what citizens voted for and giving more rights to special interest groups. Do you REALLY want a civil war? Is that what you want? Because thats what youll get if proposition 8 is overturned. If California and the other left wing liberal states countiue to rape the laws of this nation, then eventually people will get fed up, and you’ll either be forced out of this country or forced to get your politicans BACK to reality.

Answer: Hi Laura,

It's Sunday, so I can say that my wife & I will be praying for you. You definitely need it. You also need to take a look at the actual people who are affected by prop 8:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/couragecampaign/sets/72157611501972510/show/
http://www.couragecampaign.org/page/s/divorce

The state of CA has EVERY right to overturn Prop 8. It's a STATE issue that was voted on by the people, & now it's up to the courts to decide if that decision was, indeed, constitutional.

Since you obviously aren't a CA resident, I'll be nice & give you some info:

The CA constitution says that rights afforded to Californians go beyond those guaranteed by US Constitution & Federal law. The US Constitution provides basic liberties & rights that can be expanded by the State of CA. You, not being a CA resident, have no say as to what's done in MY state. We're not in Arkansas.

The predecessor to Prop 8 (Prop 22) was determined unconstitutional by CSSC (CA State Supreme Court). It was within the court's jurisdiction to do so according the CA Constitution. According to CA Constitution, the judges were within their legal jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of CA propositions & to strike down a proposition/law that was brought to trial if they deem it unconstitutional. The ruling had nothing to do with the U.S. Constitution, but was based on the California State Constitution's guarantee of the "right to marry" and its guarantee of "equal protection" under the law.

The Court did not rule that California must allow same-sex couples the right to enter into marriage. It ruled that if the state allows opposite-sex couples to do so, then same-sex couples must be treated equally. The Court explicitly left open the possibility that the state could distinguish between "marriage " (as a religious institution) and "civil unions" (as a secular institution)-- i.e., that California law could leave the definition of "marriage " to religious institutions and only offer and recognize "civil unions" for legal purposes -- provided that it treated opposite-sex and same-sex couples equally. The key legal issue is equal treatment by the State as a secular matter, not defining "marriage " for religious purposes.

Now that Prop 8 has passed & is written in the Constitution, the petitions have been filed to challenge the validity of Prop 8 per the CA Constitution. The case has been accepted for review. This review falls under CSSC jurisdiction. It will also determine the fate of the 18,000 SSM that have occurred since June 15th through Nov 4th. The court is set to hear the case in March 2009 & rule in June 2009.

As far as a civil war, raping of the laws of this nation, & other craziness you spout, please explain yourself. STop clinging to your Bible & your right wing ideology, & recognize the fact that not all Americans have to think, act, work, pray & believe as YOU do in order to love this country. You need to get your head out of the clouds to retake a US history & US COnstitution class to remember you're in the USA. Not Iraq, bot Iran. We do get to VOTE on issues that are important to us. We do not get bullied into how we vote. Prop 8 is getting more press since the CSSC is hearing the case in a few days. And it matters because it will affect my LIFE. I have a wife & a family to raise & love. I will fight to give them all the benefits I am entitled to from my service to this great nation, & my employer.

I am a veteran of the Army, & fought in Iraq AND Afghnaistan in order for you to have the freedoms you enjoy today, which include the freedom to your opinion & warped point of view. The onlyone threatening this country right now is YOU & your narrow-minded views. Look up the words democratic republic, freedom, & civil war. Your rant makes you look uneducated & misinformed.

And one last thing? No matter how much you hate CA or how much people hate ignorant people from other US STates spouting lies about this country or how we govern, you can't kick a state out of the union. It's not going to happen.
Category: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered

Why does the Right Wing keep diluting our Voter Rights and when will it stop?

The Supreme Court on Tuesday gutted a key part of the landmark Voting Rights Act, passed in 1965 to end a century of attempts by former slaveholding states to block blacks from voting.

In a 5-4 ruling with the courts conservatives in the majority, the justices ruled that Congress had used obsolete reasoning in continuing to force nine states, mainly in the South, to get federal approval for voting rule changes affecting blacks and other minorities.

The court ruled in favor of officials from Shelby County, Alabama, by declaring invalid a section of the law that set a formula that determines which states need federal approval to change voting laws.

President Barack Obama quickly called on Congress to pass a new law to ensure equal access to voting polls for all.

Category: Politics