High court strikes down key provision of Voting Rights Act

Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act : Photo Gallery

US SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT – live ... US SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT – live ... US Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act – live	26scotus4_cnd-superJumbo.jpg 26scotus4_cnd-superJumbo.jpg 26scotus4_cnd-superJumbo.jpg	video-voting-rights-history-articleLarge.jpg video-voting-rights-history-articleLarge.jpg video-voting-rights-history-articleLarge.jpg	Gavel Grab » Will Supreme Court Strike Down Key Part of Voting ... Gavel Grab » Will Supreme Court Strike Down Key Part of Voting ... Gavel Grab » Will Supreme Court Strike Down Key Part of Voting
Supreme Court Could Strike Down Key Part of Voting Rights Act ... Supreme Court Could Strike Down Key Part of Voting Rights Act ... Supreme Court Could Strike Down Key Part of Voting Rights Act	Voting Rights Act faces key test in Supreme Court - Los Angeles Times Voting Rights Act faces key test in Supreme Court - Los Angeles Times Voting Rights Act faces key test in Supreme Court - Los Angeles Times	Supreme Court Could Strike Down Key Part of Voting Rights Act ... Supreme Court Could Strike Down Key Part of Voting Rights Act ... Supreme Court Could Strike Down Key Part of Voting Rights Act	If the court strikes Section 5 of Voting Rights Act | The Great Debate If the court strikes Section 5 of Voting Rights Act | The Great Debate If the court strikes Section 5 of Voting Rights Act | The Great Debate
Obama: Keep key Voting Rights Act provision - Salon. Obama: Keep key Voting Rights Act provision - Salon. Obama: Keep key Voting Rights Act provision - Salon.	Justices May Strike Down Part Of Voting Rights Act : NPR Justices May Strike Down Part Of Voting Rights Act : NPR Justices May Strike Down Part Of Voting Rights Act : NPR	SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - News - WDWQ SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - News - WDWQ Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act - News - WDWQ	The Supreme Court could strike down part of the Voting Rights Act ... The Supreme Court could strike down part of the Voting Rights Act ... The Supreme Court could strike down part of the Voting Rights Act
vra190.png vra190.png vra190.png	26scotus4_cnd-thumbStandard.jpg 26scotus4_cnd-thumbStandard.jpg 26scotus4_cnd-thumbStandard.jpg	Supreme Court Likely to Strike Down the Voting Rights Act's ... Supreme Court Likely to Strike Down the Voting Rights Act's ... Supreme Court Likely to Strike Down the Voting Rights Act's	The Supreme Court Shouldn't Strike Down the Voting Rights Act - US ... The Supreme Court Shouldn't Strike Down the Voting Rights Act - US ... The Supreme Court Shouldn't Strike Down the Voting Rights Act - US
John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House	John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House	The Words of Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. The Words of Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. The Words of Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.	John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House
the godfather the godfather the godfather	John M. Dunsmore (2) John M. Dunsmore (2) John M. Dunsmore (2)	John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House	John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House
John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House	John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House John B. & Isabella Leech House	SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday effectively struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by a 5-to-4 vote, ruling that Congress had not provided adequate justification for subjecting nine states, mostly in the South, to federal ...	The Pros And Cons Of Starving Yourself For Two Days A Week The Pros And Cons Of Starving Yourself For Two Days A Week Supreme Court Strikes Down A Key Provision Of Law Meant To Protect. .... The U.S. Supreme Court has struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, a 1965 law that was passed to ensure minorities in the South could get out to vote. The Voting Rights ...
READ: Supreme Court strikes down key voting act provision READ: Supreme Court strikes down key voting act provision ... Court strikes down key voting act provision. By Sarah Kliff, Published: June 25, 2013 at 10:21 amE-mail the writer · Comments · Tweet. More. submit to reddit. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act ...	Document: Supreme Court strikes down key section of the Voting Rights Act Document: Supreme Court strikes down key section of the Voting Rights Act Document: Supreme Court strikes down key section of the Voting Rights Act. By Julia Kern. Digital First Media. Posted: 06/25/2013 07:24:43 AM PDT. Advertisement. Print Email Font Resize Return to Top. We welcome reader feedback! Learn more about our ...	Supreme Court voids key part of Voting Rights Act Supreme Court voids key part of Voting Rights Act The court did not strike down the advance approval requirement of the law that has been used, mainly in the South, to open up polling places to minority voters in the nearly half century since it was first enacted in 1965. But they said lawmakers must ...	High court voids key part of Voting Rights Act High court voids key part of Voting Rights Act Holder, a voting rights case in Alabama. The Supreme Court says a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act cannot be enforced until Congress comes up with a new way of determining which states and localities require close federal monitoring of ...
Supreme Court Strikes Down Key Provision Of Voting Rights Law Supreme Court Strikes Down Key Provision Of Voting Rights Law By a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court has struck down a key provision of the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act that establishes a formula to identify states that may require extra scrutiny by the Justice Department regarding voting procedures. ... As the ...	US top court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act US top court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act WASHINGTON, (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court today gutted a key portion of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965, ruling that Congress used obsolete reasoning in continuing to force nine states, mainly in the South, to get federal approval for ...	High Court Strikes Down Key Provision In Voting Rights Act High Court Strikes Down Key Provision In Voting Rights Act Law360, New York (June 25, 2013, 11:12 AM ET) -- A divided U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act that determines which states and jurisdictions must seek federal review before changing their voting ...	Supreme Court 2013: The Year in Review Supreme Court 2013: The Year in Review Entry 7: It's not hypocritical to want the Supreme Court to strike down DOMA but not the Voting Rights Act. ... Windsor. At issue is the part of the Defense of Marriage Act that defines “spouse,” and “marriage,” for all federal purposes, to exclude ...
High court strikes down key provision of Voting Rights Act High court strikes down key provision of Voting Rights Act High court strikes down key provision of Voting Rights Act. by Ross Ramsey and Julián Aguilar, The Texas Tribune June 25, 2013. photo illustration by: Todd Wiseman. The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declared Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act ...	Voting Rights Act: Supreme Court Strikes Down Key Provision for First Time ... Voting Rights Act: Supreme Court Strikes Down Key Provision for First Time ... The Supreme Court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that determines which state and local government have to seek federal permission to change their voting laws, NBC News and Fox News reported on Tuesday. The 5-4 majority ...	Voting Rights Act: Supreme Court Says Times Have Changed Voting Rights Act: Supreme Court Says Times Have Changed Listen to the Story. Tell Me More. 12 min 29 sec. Playlist; Download. The Supreme Court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act today. Host Michel Martin speaks with two court watchers about what the decision means. Share. Facebook; Twitter.	Republicans facing dilemma if Supreme Court strikes down Voting Rights Act Republicans facing dilemma if Supreme Court strikes down Voting Rights Act BIRMINGHAM, Alabama – The much anticipated decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on a key section of the 1965 Voting Rights Act remains much anticipated. The court this morning handed down decisions in only three cases and the Voting Rights Act case ...
Supreme Court Voting Rights Act ruling underscores wide media rift Supreme Court Voting Rights Act ruling underscores wide media rift Remember my Info. Truth, like beauty, is evidently in the eye of the beholder. This is clear not from the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday to strike down a key provision of 1965 Voting Rights Act but from the reaction of the media.	High court voids key part of Voting Rights Act - CBS Atlanta 46 High court voids key part of Voting Rights Act - CBS Atlanta 46 WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court says a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act cannot be enforced until Congress comes up with a new way of determining which states and localities require close federal monitoring of elections. The justices ...

Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act : Videos

Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting ... Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting ... Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act. Duration: 31 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 07:52:59 -0700	Court Strikes Down Key Provision In Voting Rights ... Court Strikes Down Key Provision In Voting Rights ... Court Strikes Down Key Provision In Voting Rights Act! - Judge Andrew ... In Mixed Ruling ... Duration: 412 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:41:39 -0700	What If The Supreme Court Strikes Down Sec. 5 of ... What If The Supreme Court Strikes Down Sec. 5 of ... What If The Supreme Court Strikes Down Sec. 5 of The .... Supreme Court Threatens Voting ... Duration: 445 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:32:32 -0800	Supreme Court Voids Key Part of Voting Rights ... Supreme Court Voids Key Part of Voting Rights ... ... Court struck down a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act ... Supreme Court ... Duration: 199 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:07:19 -0700
WASHINGTON WATCH: Voting Rights Act And ... WASHINGTON WATCH: Voting Rights Act And ... WASHINGTON WATCH: Voting Rights Act And Voting Right May Be Struck Down By The ... Duration: 473 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:46:51 -0800	Supreme Court Stikes Down Parts of Voting Rights ... Supreme Court Stikes Down Parts of Voting Rights ... Supreme Court Stikes Down Parts of Voting Rights Act ... Federal Court Strikes Down Key ... Duration: 315 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:40:20 -0700	Supreme Court overturns Voting Rights Act ... Supreme Court overturns Voting Rights Act ... The Supreme Court ruled on Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder Monday, striking down ... Duration: 276 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 07:24:08 -0700	The People March for Voting Rights in Selma, AL ... The People March for Voting Rights in Selma, AL ... Tonight at 8 pm ET on The Middle Ground, we'll discuss the Supreme Court case that could ... Duration: 75 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:53:06 -0800
US supreme court to hear voting rights case - YouTube US supreme court to hear voting rights case - YouTube The US Supreme Court is to hear a challenge to a key section of the ... WATCH: Voting ... Duration: 161 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:38:49 -0800	Conservatives on Supreme Court cast doubt on ... Conservatives on Supreme Court cast doubt on ... WASHINGTON (Reuters) Conservatives on the Supreme Court ... strong doubts about the ... Duration: 25 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:38:49 -0800	Voting Rights Law Under Fire in Supreme Court ... Voting Rights Law Under Fire in Supreme Court ... ... 1965 Voting Rights Act is being challenged in the Supreme Court case, ... morning to ... Duration: 151 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:52:18 -0800	The "Citizens United" for Voting Rights? Civil ... The "Citizens United" for Voting Rights? Civil ... The U.S. Supreme Court is considering overturning the 1965 ... ... overturning the 1965 Voting ... Duration: 93 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:50:01 -0800
Supreme Court Hears Voting Rights Act Case - YouTube Supreme Court Hears Voting Rights Act Case - YouTube U.S. Supreme Court Justices heard final arguments in a case centered around a key ... Duration: 121 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Sat, 11 May 2013 17:06:08 -0700	The Supreme Court Considers the Voting Rights ... The Supreme Court Considers the Voting Rights ... The Supreme Court this week will take up a case that could end Justice ... Shelby County, Ala ... Duration: 289 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:46:07 -0800	The Supreme Court on the 1965 Voting Rights Act ... The Supreme Court on the 1965 Voting Rights Act ... The Supreme Court on the 1965 Voting Rights Act ... Supreme Court Threatens Voting ... Duration: 498 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:03:51 -0700	Voting Rights Are Still Under Attack; Supreme Court ... Voting Rights Are Still Under Attack; Supreme Court ... What If The Supreme Court Strikes Down Sec. 5 of The ... Supreme Court Threatens Voting ... Duration: 464 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:15:13 -0800
Supreme Court hears Voting Rights Act case on ... Supreme Court hears Voting Rights Act case on ... Outside the U.S. Supreme Court on February 27, 2013, the day ... WASHINGTON WATCH ... Duration: 171 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:29:33 -0800	Voting Rights Act Takes Hit by Supreme Court - 6 ... Voting Rights Act Takes Hit by Supreme Court - 6 ... The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a section of the Voting Rights ... Voting Rights ... Duration: 346 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:20:31 -0700	Federal Court Strikes Down Key Part of DOMA - YouTube Federal Court Strikes Down Key Part of DOMA - YouTube A federal appeals court in Boston struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act — or ... Duration: 114 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Thu, 31 May 2012 15:09:06 -0700	GOP to Blow Up the Voting Rights Act? - YouTube GOP to Blow Up the Voting Rights Act? - YouTube To get rid of the Voting Rights Act! And that's what they're trying to do. ... an amicus brief ... Duration: 202 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:28:53 -0700
Civil Rights Act: The GOP Supreme Court Justices ... Civil Rights Act: The GOP Supreme Court Justices ... Civil Rights Act: The GOP Supreme Court Justices Think Racism is Over! ... WASHINGTON ... Duration: 809 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:13:29 -0800	Supreme Court strikes down Medicaid expansion ... Supreme Court strikes down Medicaid expansion ... The Supreme Court has ruled that a key part of President Obama's health ... Scalia ... Duration: 82 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:08:45 -0700	Inside Story Americas - How relevant is the US ... Inside Story Americas - How relevant is the US ... The five-decades-old Voting Rights Act is considered a triumph of the civil rights era. ... What If ... Duration: 1503 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:02:41 -0800	Voting Rights: Supreme Court to Weigh Civil ... Voting Rights: Supreme Court to Weigh Civil ... Monday Supreme Court justices officially re-convened for the 2012 session. They could ... Duration: 110 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: youtube.com on Mon, 01 Oct 2012 17:48:04 -0700

Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act : Latest News, Information, Answers and Websites

Reconstruction in the south after the civil war..?

Im writing a newspaper for a school project and one of the articles has to be about reconstruction in the North and in the South, Ive read a lot of links, but Im having a really hard time understanding. I just need a basic summary of what happened during the reconstruction period in the North and South. If anyone could give me a simple link, or explain it in laymans terms, Id greatly appreciate it! :)

Answer: After the end of the Civil War, as part of the on-going process of Reconstruction, the United States Congress passed four statutes known as Reconstruction Acts. Fulfillment of the requirements of the Acts were necessary for the former Confederate States to be readmitted to the Union. The Acts excluded Tennessee, which had already ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and had been readmitted to the Union.

A key feature of the Acts included the creation of five military districts, each commanded by a general, which would serve as the acting government for the region. In addition, Congress required that each state draft a new state constitution, which would have to be approved by Congress. The states also were required to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment and grant voting rights to black men.

President Andrew Johnson's vetoes of these measures were overridden by Congress. After Ex Parte McCardle (1867) came before the Supreme Court, Congress feared that the Court might strike the Reconstruction Acts down as unconstitutional. To prevent this, Congress repealed the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867, revoking to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over the case.

I hope this help a little.(:
Fan me, so I may be able to help you in the future.(:
Category: History

BREAKING: Supreme Court Strikes Down Provisions Of The Voting ...

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court struck down a key provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The preclearance requirement in Section 5 was upheld, b. ... But they said lawmakers must update the formula for determining which parts of the country must seek Washington's approval for election changes. From NBC News: Under the law, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, nine mostly Southern states must get permission from the Justice Department or a special panel of ...

Johnsons reconstruction act?

can someone please help me understand Johnson"s reconstruction act.

I have a paper due on racism after the civil war.
thank you! :)

Answer: After the end of the confederate civil war, as part of the on-going process of Reconstruction, the United States Congress passed four statutes known as Reconstruction Acts. Fulfillment of the requirements of the Acts were necessary for the former Confederate States to be readmitted to the Union. The Acts excluded Texas, which had already ratified the 13th amendment and had been readmitted to the Union.

A key feature of the Acts included the creation of five military districts in the South, each commanded by a general, which would serve as the acting government for the region. In addition, Congress required that each state draft a new state constitution, which would have to be approved by Congress. The states also were required to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment and grant voting rights to black men.

President Andrew Johnson's vetoes of these measures were overridden by Congress. After Ex Parte McCardle (1867) came before the Supreme Court, Congress feared that the Court might strike the Reconstruction Acts down as unconstitutional. To prevent this, Congress repealed the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867, revoking to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over the case.
Category: Homework Help

Live Analysis of the Supreme Court Decision on the Voting Rights Act

The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a central part of the Voting Rights Act. Times reporters and editors are analyzing the Supreme Court decision and its implications, as well as the public's reaction. Coverage; All.

American Atheists and Homosexuals: Do you REALLY want a civil war?

Im noticing an increase in prop 8 questions. Just a few days before the state of California decides whether it will honor the laws of the land or whether it will go against the people and rape this laws of this nation.

Understand this: the state of California has NO RIGHT to overturn prop 8. That would be unconsitituional and illegal. The state has no right to overturn what the PEOPLE "we the people" voted on. I dont live in California, but unfortuatley is IS part of my country, so what happens there does affect us even at the other side of the country. If California overturns Propoisition 8 ... there will be hell to pay, because the intelligent law abiding citizens of this nation will not allow one of our states to violate the constitution of this nation by going against what citizens voted for and giving more rights to special interest groups. Do you REALLY want a civil war? Is that what you want? Because thats what youll get if proposition 8 is overturned. If California and the other left wing liberal states countiue to rape the laws of this nation, then eventually people will get fed up, and you’ll either be forced out of this country or forced to get your politicans BACK to reality.

Answer: Hi Laura,

It's Sunday, so I can say that my wife & I will be praying for you. You definitely need it. You also need to take a look at the actual people who are affected by prop 8:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/couragecampaign/sets/72157611501972510/show/
http://www.couragecampaign.org/page/s/divorce

The state of CA has EVERY right to overturn Prop 8. It's a STATE issue that was voted on by the people, & now it's up to the courts to decide if that decision was, indeed, constitutional.

Since you obviously aren't a CA resident, I'll be nice & give you some info:

The CA constitution says that rights afforded to Californians go beyond those guaranteed by US Constitution & Federal law. The US Constitution provides basic liberties & rights that can be expanded by the State of CA. You, not being a CA resident, have no say as to what's done in MY state. We're not in Arkansas.

The predecessor to Prop 8 (Prop 22) was determined unconstitutional by CSSC (CA State Supreme Court). It was within the court's jurisdiction to do so according the CA Constitution. According to CA Constitution, the judges were within their legal jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of CA propositions & to strike down a proposition/law that was brought to trial if they deem it unconstitutional. The ruling had nothing to do with the U.S. Constitution, but was based on the California State Constitution's guarantee of the "right to marry" and its guarantee of "equal protection" under the law.

The Court did not rule that California must allow same-sex couples the right to enter into marriage. It ruled that if the state allows opposite-sex couples to do so, then same-sex couples must be treated equally. The Court explicitly left open the possibility that the state could distinguish between "marriage " (as a religious institution) and "civil unions" (as a secular institution)-- i.e., that California law could leave the definition of "marriage " to religious institutions and only offer and recognize "civil unions" for legal purposes -- provided that it treated opposite-sex and same-sex couples equally. The key legal issue is equal treatment by the State as a secular matter, not defining "marriage " for religious purposes.

Now that Prop 8 has passed & is written in the Constitution, the petitions have been filed to challenge the validity of Prop 8 per the CA Constitution. The case has been accepted for review. This review falls under CSSC jurisdiction. It will also determine the fate of the 18,000 SSM that have occurred since June 15th through Nov 4th. The court is set to hear the case in March 2009 & rule in June 2009.

As far as a civil war, raping of the laws of this nation, & other craziness you spout, please explain yourself. STop clinging to your Bible & your right wing ideology, & recognize the fact that not all Americans have to think, act, work, pray & believe as YOU do in order to love this country. You need to get your head out of the clouds to retake a US history & US COnstitution class to remember you're in the USA. Not Iraq, bot Iran. We do get to VOTE on issues that are important to us. We do not get bullied into how we vote. Prop 8 is getting more press since the CSSC is hearing the case in a few days. And it matters because it will affect my LIFE. I have a wife & a family to raise & love. I will fight to give them all the benefits I am entitled to from my service to this great nation, & my employer.

I am a veteran of the Army, & fought in Iraq AND Afghnaistan in order for you to have the freedoms you enjoy today, which include the freedom to your opinion & warped point of view. The onlyone threatening this country right now is YOU & your narrow-minded views. Look up the words democratic republic, freedom, & civil war. Your rant makes you look uneducated & misinformed.

And one last thing? No matter how much you hate CA or how much people hate ignorant people from other US STates spouting lies about this country or how we govern, you can't kick a state out of the union. It's not going to happen.
Category: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered

Voting Rights Act Section 4 Struck Down By Supreme Court

2 hours ago ... The Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act on ... provision of the landmark civil rights law that designates which parts of ...

High court voids key part of Voting Rights Act

49 minutes ago ... The court did not strike down the advance approval requirement of ... The Supreme Court says a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights ...

Is this considered conservative or liberal?

I know, I know, its the third time I asked this type of question and I swear it is my last one.

Can someone summarize the main points of this editorial? And is it conservative or liberal?

GUN RIGHTS
Thirty-thousand Americans are killed by guns every year — on the job, walking to school, at the shopping mall. The Supreme Court on Thursday all but ensured that even more Americans will die senselessly with its wrongheaded and dangerous ruling striking down key parts of the District of Columbia’s gun-control law.

In a radical break from 70 years of Supreme Court precedent, Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, declared that the Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to bear arms for nonmilitary uses, even though the amendment clearly links the right to service in a “militia.” The ruling will give gun-rights advocates a powerful new legal tool to try to strike down gun-control laws across the nation.

This is a decision that will cost innocent lives, cause immeasurable pain and suffering and turn America into a more dangerous country. It will also diminish our standing in the world, sending yet another message that the United States values gun rights over human life.

There already is a national glut of firearms: estimates run between 193 million and 250 million guns. The harm they do is constantly on heartbreaking display. Thirty-three dead last year in the shootings at Virginia Tech. Six killed this year at Northern Illinois University.

On Wednesday, as the court was getting ready to release its decision, a worker in a Kentucky plastics plant shot his supervisor, four co-workers and himself to death.

Cities and states have tried to stanch the killing with gun-control laws. The District of Columbia, which has one of the nation’s highest crime rates, banned the possession of nearly all handguns and required that other firearms be stored unloaded and disassembled, or bound with a trigger lock.

Overturning that law, the court’s 5-to-4 decision says that individuals have a constitutional right to keep guns in their homes for self-defense. But that’s a sharp reversal for the court: as early as 1939, it made clear that the Second Amendment only protects the right of people to carry guns for military use in a militia.

In his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens was right when he said that the court has now established “a new constitutional right” that creates a “dramatic upheaval in the law.”

Even if there were a constitutional right to possess guns for nonmilitary uses, constitutional rights are not absolute. The First Amendment guarantees free speech, but that does not mean that laws cannot prohibit some spoken words, like threats to commit imminent violent acts. In his dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer argued soundly that whatever right gun owners have to unimpeded gun use is outweighed by the District of Columbia’s “compelling” public-safety interests.

In this month’s case recognizing the habeas corpus rights of the detainees at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, Justice Scalia wrote in dissent that the decision “will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.” Those words apply with far more force to his opinion in this District of Columbia case.

The gun lobby will now trumpet this ruling as an end to virtually all gun restrictions, anywhere, at all times. That must not happen. And today’s decision still provides strong basis for saying it should not.

If the ruling is held to apply to the states, and not just to the District of Columbia — which is not certain — there will still be considerable dispute about what it means for other less-sweeping gun laws. Judges may end up deciding these on a law-by-law basis.

Supporters of gun control must fight in court to ensure that registration requirements and background-check rules, and laws against bulk sales of handguns — a major source of guns used in crimes — are all upheld.

The court left room for gun-control advocates to fight back. It made clear that there were gun restrictions that it was not calling into question, including bans on gun possession by felons and the mentally ill, or in “sensitive places” like schools and government buildings.

That last part is the final indignity of the decision: when the justices go to work at the Supreme Court, guns will still be banned. When most Americans show up at their own jobs, they will not have that protection.

This audaciously harmful decision, which hands the far right a victory it has sought for decades, is a powerful reminder of why voters need to have the Supreme Court firmly in mind when they vote for the president this fall.

Senator John McCain has said he would appoint justices like Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito — both of whom supported this decision. If the court is allowed to tip even further to the far right, there will be even more damage done to the rights and the safety of Americans.


Polly is definitley not getting the ten bonus points.

Maybe there is someone here that will actually give me a reasonable opinion, rather than wasting their own time, calling me lazy.
Thank you for your concern, Polly, but I have no interest in politics, whatsoever. It was required for me to take it and I just have to stick it out for two more weeks.

Oh, and I cant comprehend anything that has to do with politics.

Hmm... maybe youre right about the Sarah Palin thing...

Answer: Are you Sarah Palin ?

(Polly doesn't care about points, Ellena. Polly wants you to learn to think, and that's what your teacher wants also. You have been given all the info you need, in class, to complete this assignment. It is up to you to do the thinking part.)
(What will you learn if someone gives you their opinion? That won't help you to learn to think or to think logically so that you can form your own opinion. When you grow up, are you going to vote based on the opinions of others? Your teacher is trying to get you to trust your own thoughts and ideas, and be able to defend them. I know you are probably young and not used to politics, but I don't think it matters if you are correct in your analysis of the of the political stuff at this point. What matters is that you learn to recognize fallacies and illogic so that you can grow up to support ideas based on merit and not on what other people think. This is the responsibility that goes along with the right to vote. And you have to start somewhere.)
(And the lazy part - that was an adult joke. You are obviously not lazy, as you have spent a lot of energy over the last almost 3 hours trying to get someone to do your work. The assignment is not that hard, you just aren't used to it. You can slap something together by copying and pasting the answers of these well-meaning answerers, but you won't learn anything that way. I would reallly like to see you do this yourself, using the references I mentioned. You CAN do it.)
(LOL, no I am not right about the Sarah Palin thing. That is why you are having so much trouble. You don't trust your own abilities. You CAN do this assignment. Okay, so maybe you won't get the best grade, but you will learn how to discipline yourself to think. Politics are complex and there really are no right or wrong answers, only opinions. And your opinions are just as valid as anyone else's. You just don't recognize that yet.)
(Good luck. I'm done here, I'll probably get reported for socializing or whatever it is. It will be worth it. Have faith in yourself. Hug.)
Category: Politics

THE 2004 CAMPAIGN; Excerpts From the Debate Between the Vice Presidential Candidates in Cleveland

Following are excerpts from the vice presidential debate last night in Cleveland between Vice President Dick Cheney and Senator John Edwards of North Carolina, as recorded by The New York Times. The moderator was Gwen Ifill of PBS. A full transcript is at www.nytimes.com. The Iraq War MS. IFILL -- Vice President Cheney, there have been new

Supreme Court strikes down part of Voting Rights Act - Chicago Sun ...

2 hours ago ... The Supreme Court says a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act cannot be ... Supreme Court strikes down part of Voting Rights Act.

High court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act in 5-4 ruling ...

2 hours ago ... The 5-4 decision strikes down a key piece of the civil rights law designed to protect minorities from discrimination. The Supreme Court struck ...

Morning round up: SCOTUS strikes down key parts of Voting Rights ...

Josh Barro, Politics Editor at Business Insider (@jbarro). First up, breaking news from the Supreme Court, as it votes to strike down key parts of the Voting Rights Act. From NBC News: The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a ...

Describe the effects that the Military Reconstruction Act had on the South.?

Best answer!

Answer: After the end of the Civil War, as part of the on-going process of Reconstruction, the United States Congress passed four statutes known as Reconstruction Acts. Fulfillment of the requirements of the Acts were necessary for the former Confederate States to be readmitted to the Union. The Acts excluded Tennessee, which had already ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and had been readmitted to the Union.

A key feature of the Acts included the creation of five military districts, each commanded by a general, which would serve as the acting government for the region. In addition, Congress required that each state draft a new state constitution, which would have to be approved by Congress. The states also were required to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment and grant voting rights to black men.

President Andrew Johnson's vetoes of these measures were overridden by Congress. After Ex Parte McCardle (1867) came before the Supreme Court, Congress feared that the Court might strike the Reconstruction Acts down as unconstitutional. To prevent this, Congress repealed the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867, revoking to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over the case.

I hope this help.(:
Fan me, so I may be able to help you in the future.(:
Category: History

THE 2004 CAMPAIGN: The Vice-Presidential Debate; Excerpts From the Debate Between the Vice-Presidential Candidates in Cleveland

The Vice-Presidential Debate: Theres a Fundamental Difference of Opinion HereThe Vice-Presidential Debate: Theres a Fundamental Difference of Opinion HereFollowing are excerpts from the vice-presidential debate last night between Vice President Dick Cheney and Senator John Edwards of North Carolina, as recorded by The New York Times. The - Excerpts from vice presidential debate between Vice Pres Dick Cheney and Sen John Edwards (L)

SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT ...

1 hour ago ... WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In a major blow to civil rights activists, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down an important part of a 48-year-old ...

SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT - USA Today

16 minutes ago ... The Supreme Court swept away nearly 50 years of civil rights history, declaring a key part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act unconstitutional ...

High court voids key part of Voting Rights Act - TwinCities.com

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act cannot be enforced unless Congress comes up with an up-to-date formula for deciding which states and localities still need federal monitoring. ... The court did not strike down the advance approval requirement of the law that has been used, mainly in the South, to open up polling places to minority voters in the nearly half century since it was first enacted in 1965.

SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT

The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a key part of the historic Voting Rights Act of 1965, sending the section that determines which states need extra attention about discrimination back to Congress to be re-written.

SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT | KFOR.com

WASHINGTON - A deeply divided U.S. Supreme Court stuck down a key part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act Tuesday. The nation's highest court ruled parts of the act unconstitutional, in effect, invalidating federal enforcement ...

Supreme Court strikes down key provision of Voting Rights Act ...

Supreme Court strikes down key provision of Voting Rights Act, narrows its scope. ... Mike Flynn: “Updated to correct error on my part” Speaker Silver really does appear not to merely be a... Electric Tesla vs Power of Money ...

Supreme Court Strikes Down Key Provision Of Voting Rights Law ...

By a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court has struck down a key provision of the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act that establishes a formula to identify states that may require extra scrutiny by the Justice Department regarding voting procedures. ... As the AP explains it, the Supreme Court has essentially decided that Section 5 of the act — the part that requires certain states with a history of discrimination to have changes to any voting procedures approved by the federal ...

SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT That ...

Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act That Discriminated Against The South. Jun 25, 2013 No Comments ›› Chuck Biscuits. Excerpted from  ...

SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN KEY PART OF VOTING RIGHTS ACT | 7online ...

The Supreme Court says a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act cannot be enforced until Congress comes up with a new way of determining which ...